Construction firms urged to rethink psychosocial risk management
The federal government has retired Australia's most widely used psychosocial risk framework, prompting construction firms to reassess how they manage workplace mental health risks.
What should construction businesses do now that the national psychosocial risk framework has been retired?
Builders and contractors must review psychosocial risk management practices to stay compliant. Failure to adapt could expose firms to regulatory and legal risk.
Key takeaways
- The federal government has retired Australia's most widely used psychosocial risk framework.
- Construction and building firms are urged to reassess their current mental health risk processes.
- Companies that don't update their approach may face compliance and regulatory exposure.
- The change affects how workplace mental health obligations are managed across the industry.
Related
WA passes new payment protection laws for subcontractors
Western Australia's Parliament has passed new payment protection laws for subcontractors. The changes, made through an amendment to the Building and Construction Industry (Security of Payment) legislation, aim to give subcontractors stronger protection against insolvency.
Why it matters: Subcontractors in WA, including plumbers, electricians, carpenters and other trades, get stronger protection if a head contractor becomes insolvent. This could reduce the risk of unpaid work and cash flow problems.
ATO ramp up of small business debt collection
Master Builders Australia has published a news item saying the ATO is stepping up its debt collection against small businesses. The text provided gives no further detail on the measures, timing or amounts.
Why it matters: Builders and other trade businesses with outstanding tax debts may face firmer ATO collection action, which could strain cash flow. Details are not in the source text, so check the ATO or Master Builders directly.
Builders Oppose Proposed Jobs Framework and Supplier Code
Master Builders Australia opposes the proposed Secure Australian Jobs Framework and changes to the Commonwealth Supplier Code. The article excerpt gives no further detail on what the proposals contain.
Why it matters: Builders and contractors working on or seeking Commonwealth-funded projects could face new employment and supplier requirements. The practical impact is unclear until details of the proposals are released.